“ASAN’s objection is fundamentally an ethical one. The stated end goal of ABA is an autistic child who is “indistinguishable from their peers”—an autistic child who can pass as neurotypical. We don’t think that’s an acceptable goal. The end goal of all services, supports, interventions, and therapies an autistic child receives should be to support them in growing up into an autistic adult who is happy, healthy, and living a self-determined life.”
– Julia Bascom, Executive Director, Autistic Self Advocacy Network
Despite some industry changes in applied behavioral analysis practices and therapy models, ABA practices will always be based upon a foundation of compliance, coercion, and behaviorist principles. It is impossible to practice ABA even gently or playfully, without attempting to control and manipulate a person’s behavior.
The fundamental goal of ABA is compliance with the will of the person in the position of authority; this is completely counter-intuitive to self-advocacy, self-determination, and upholding human rights and dignity.
The Therapist Neurodiversity Collective has strong ethical concerns and philosophical differences pertaining to the use of Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) on human beings, including ABA-derived therapy models and relationship-based therapy models paired with ABA. Our members pledge to provide therapy in manners that uphold the dignity of the individual while promoting self-determination. We are troubled that ABA is performed on pediatric, adult, and elderly populations without consent from the humans on the receiving end.
Our therapists provide trauma-informed, research-based alternatives to ABA-based behavior management. We do so in accordance with evidence-based, ethical, and empathetic practices.
Licensed and ASHA Certified Speech-Language Pathologists have the unique, necessary training and education in anatomy, physiology, neurology, and neurological based conditions, language development, and motor development to address self and/or other-harming client behaviors through the investigation of the underlying causes. Trained SLPs and their SLP-Assistants teach clients to self-advocate through functional communication, thereby ensuring that they retain the inherent human-right of self-determination. Occupational Therapists focus on a person’s ability to function independently rather than the “function” of any particular “behavior”. What guides the practice of an Occupational Therapist is what is of most importance to the client – personal goals, hobbies, and occupations. OTs teach the skills for the job of living, using a broad knowledge-base of anatomy and physiology, neuroscience, psychology, and activity analysis to help people achieve their highest level of independence with the activities of daily living that are most meaningful to the client. Therapist Neurodiversity Collective therapists listen to and respect Autistic and other Neurodivergent voices. Our therapists do not “treat autism.” Coercing a neurodivergent person to “normalize” through ABA and/or other masking therapy models is disrespectful and can cause substantial trauma.
We do not force compliance through the earning of snacks, check-marks, behavior charts, stickers, access to favorite or personal items and objects, activities, or similar. We completely reject aversion therapy (punishment) for any situation, including withholding attention or affection, favored foods, activities, or objects. We don’t train human beings like pigeons, chickens or dogs.
Regarding ABA aversion therapy: We are appalled and horrified that the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI) chooses to condone painful electric shock aversion therapy at the Judge Rotenberg Center, which the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture has condemned as a violation of international torture conventions. We are horrified that the JRC will continue the fight to keep torturing human beings. It is disturbing to us that BCAB allows for the “ethical” use of punishment. (See section 4.08 in the Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts.)
We do not force-feed children, patients with dementia, or those with other neurological or cognitive decline or injury. Compulsory-feeding is abusive and traumatic and poses significant physical, emotional, and psychological risks.
We do not suppress stimming or echolalia, force eye-contact, or require “whole body listening.” We do not steal childhoods from children via 20–40 hours of ABA per week. Autistic and other neurodivergent children deserve unstructured free time, just the same as neurotypical children.
We presume competence in every client and patient. We speak and interact with disabled and/or non-speaking people the same as any other clients and patients we serve. We accept all forms of communication as valid. Our therapists provide barrier-free access to AAC with no prerequisites.
Annual Report on Autism Care Demonstration Program for FY 2020 June 25, 2020: Report to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives on TRICARE and ABA
(Warning – Ableist Language)
“DISCUSSION OF THE EVIDENCE REGARDING CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT OF CHILDREN DIAGNOSED WITH ASD:”
While there is some limited research suggesting early behavioral and developmental interventions (based on the principles of ABA services delivered in intensive and comprehensive programs) can significantly affect the development of some children diagnosed with ASD, not all children diagnosed with ASD receiving ABA services show improvements. Two well-respected medical literature review services, external to DHA, continue to find the evidence for ABA services (Intensive Behavior Intervention) for the diagnosis of ASD is weak, noting, “An overall low-quality body of evidence mainly from poor-quality studies suggests that Intensive Behavior Intervention (IBI) improves intelligence or cognitive skills, visual-spatial skills, language skills, and adaptive behavior compared with baseline levels or other treatments. Six years after this agency’s extensive June 2013 ABA coverage review, the published reliable evidence does not reflect any consensus as to whether the reported improvements are clinically significant; very few studies reported on the clinical significance of findings. A paucity of evidence regarding the durability of treatment following treatment cessation, as well as uncertainty regarding optimal therapy parameters, preclude firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of IBI for ASD” (Hayes 2019) 6. Cochrane (2018) 7 noted, “The strength of the evidence in this review is limited because it mostly comes from small studies that are not of the optimum design. Due to the inclusion of nonrandomized studies, there is a high risk of bias and we rated the overall quality of evidence as ’low’ or ’very low’ using the GRADE system, meaning further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.”
“The research literature available regarding ABA services predominantly consists of single-case design studies which does not meet criteria for “reliable evidence” under TRICARE standards. There are still methodological concerns limiting the strength of the research such as identified characteristics of children (including symptom severity), rendering providers, and types of treatment for positive outcomes. These limitations include: “dose-response” (frequency, intensity, and duration), treatment fidelity, few studies which use a control group, few longitudinal studies which demonstrate long-term effectiveness, and no replication of similar in well-designed studies.”
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE – October 2019 TRICARE-Autism-Report_
The Department of Defense reported to Congress on Oct 25, 2019, about Comprehensive Autism Care that after one year of ABA treatment, 76% of those with autism had no change in symptoms, and 9% WORSENED by more than a full standard deviation. This reaffirms Navy Capt. Edward Simmer, Chief Clinical Officer of the Tricare Health Plan, stated in November 2018 that the effectiveness of applied behavioral techniques for autism remains unproven.
For Further Reading:
First-Hand Perspectives on Behavioral Interventions for Autistic People and People with other Developmental Disabilities – Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN)
Access to Communication Services and Supports: Concerns Regarding the Application of Restrictive “Eligibility” Policies – National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons With Severe Disabilities
Autism and Behaviorism -New Research Adds to an Already Compelling Case Against ABA
“When a common practice isn’t necessary or useful even under presumably optimal conditions, it’s time to question whether that practice makes sense at all.”
The Hidden Potential of Autistic Kids – Scientific American
The Great Big ABA Opposition Resource List – Ask an Autistic
5 Important Reasons Even “New ABA” is Problematic – Kaylene George
Research-Based Approaches to Autistic Ways of Learning – Karla McLaren
Autistic Conversion Therapy – Amy Sequenzia
DOES ABA HARM AUTISTIC PEOPLE? – AUTISTIC UK CIC